Summary and Info
The difference between Pierre Gassendi's (1592-1655) and Ren? Descartes' (1596-1650) versions of the mechanical philosophy directly reflected the differences in their theological presuppositions. Gassendi described a world utterly contingent on divine will and expressed his conviction that empirical methods are the only way to acquire knowledge about the natural world. Descartes, on the contrary, described a world in which God had embedded necessary relations, some of which enable us to have a priori knowledge of substantial parts of the natural world. In this book, Professor Osler explores theological conceptions of contingency and necessity in the world and how these ideas influenced the development of the mechanical philosophy in the seventeenth century. She examines the transformation of medieval ideas about God's relationship to the Creation into seventeenth-century ideas about matter and method as embodied in early articulations of the mechanical philosophy. Refracted through the prism of the mechanical philosophy, these theological conceptualizations of contingency and necessity in the world were mirrored in different styles of science that emerged in the second half of the seventeenth century.
More About the Author
Margaret J. (Maggie) Osler (November 27, 1942 – September 15, 2010) was a historian and philosopher of early modern science and a Professor of History at the University of Calgary.
Review and Comments
Rate the Book
Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World 0 out of 5 stars based on 0 ratings.